The relationship between an advocate and their client is founded on trust — and one of the most fundamental aspects of that trust is confidentiality. Whatever a client tells their advocate in confidence — the facts of their case, their personal circumstances, their vulnerabilities — cannot be disclosed by the advocate, even after the professional relationship ends, even if the client later becomes hostile, and even if the client publicly makes allegations against the advocate. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has now firmly upheld a 2-year suspension of an advocate's license for breaching this duty.
What Happened
An actress had engaged an advocate in connection with allegations of sexual assault against a senior police official. After the professional relationship ended, a public dispute arose between the actress and her former advocate. The advocate issued a public notice and made statements to the media that disclosed confidential information the actress had shared in the course of the professional engagement. The actress filed a complaint before the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa. The Bar Council of India's disciplinary committee suspended the advocate's license for two years. The Supreme Court upheld this suspension in full.
The Legal Duty of Confidentiality
The duty of confidentiality is codified in the Bar Council of India Rules and flows from the fiduciary nature of the advocate-client relationship. The Court stated the principle clearly:
"An advocate's duty is not conditional upon the client's continued good behaviour towards the advocate. An advocate cannot use information received in confidence against his client, and the fact that she has since become his adversary makes no difference."
This duty has no expiry date. It does not end when the retainer ends. It does not weaken when the client criticises or attacks the advocate publicly. And it is not lifted by the advocate's desire to defend their own reputation.
An advocate is in a fiduciary position with respect to their client — meaning they are in a position of trust that requires them to act entirely in the client's interest with respect to matters within the scope of the engagement. Disclosing confidential information — to the media, to opposing parties, or publicly — is a fundamental breach of this duty that the Bar Council and courts take very seriously.
What This Means for Clients
Your confidential communications with your advocate are protected — permanently. Even if you later part ways on bad terms, your advocate cannot reveal what you told them in confidence.
If an advocate has disclosed your confidential information — whether to the media, to the opposing party, or publicly — you can file a complaint before the Bar Council of the relevant State under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961. The Bar Council has disciplinary authority and can suspend or debar the advocate.
The Bar Council of Rajasthan has jurisdiction over advocates enrolled with it. Complaints regarding professional misconduct — including breach of confidentiality — must be filed there in the first instance.
Criminal remedies may also be available where the disclosure caused specific harm — defamation under Section 356 BNS, criminal breach of trust under Section 316 BNS, and in some cases IT Act offences if the disclosure was made digitally.
Frequently Asked Questions
Questions people commonly search on this topic